Saxby Chambliss
Vote History
-
ON BAILOUT
7 Sources for Position on the Bailout
| Posted By | Summary | Bailout? | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| reclaimyourrepublic 10.1.08 |
After many busy signals, transfers to a full voice mailbox, I finally spoke to a gentleman who sounded like he had been answering calls like mine all day. Saxby is voting yes, and I strongly urged him to reconsider, and I reminded him that he is up for re-election in one month. |
For | Phone Call |
| GaPeach 10.1.08 |
9:18 am Spoke to his office again. Citing one of his reasons for voting for this atrocity. I explained basically that bad credit begets bad credit. She argued with me slightly. This office really needs more education and calls. |
For | Phone Call |
| GaPeach 10.1.08 |
Chambliss pushes bailout, says banks are not making loans. Hmm.. I live in Georgia. I called my banker yesterday and I could get a commercial loan for around 7-7.5%. The market is adjusting, interest rates are going up. Only those who can pay for their loan will get loans. It's that simple. We need to put pressue on Chambliss and Isakson. |
For | Article |
| GaPeach 10.1.08 |
Statement on Status of Financial "Rescue" Plan Senators Chambliss and Issakson need a lot of pressure this morning (10-01-08). They must recognize and keep their oath to The Constitution. Please keep calling. |
For | Article |
| theaman 9.29.08 |
CALLED 2:11PM VOTING YES - URGED HIM TO RECONSIDER AND LOOK AT A MARKET SOLUTION INSTEAD |
For | Phone Call |
| GaPeach 9.29.08 |
Phoned his office, he is voting YES. Keep calling, there is still time... |
For | Phone Call |
| GaPeach 9.29.08 |
"Chambliss Statement on Financial Package" AKA "BAILOUT" September 25, 2008 WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., today made the following statement: As the conversations in Washington continue over how to address our nation’s financial crisis, and as the details of the problems in our financial sector are revealed daily, I am convinced that something must be done and done soon. But I want to be clear about congressional action: we must act because inaction will do serious harm to American families, farms, and small businesses as well as community banks and other lenders, and we must do our dead level best to make the right decisions, because action for the sake of expediency could put our nation at further risk. Since last Thursday I have talked to numerous bankers, economists, academicians, as well as business leaders and owners who have told me that doing nothing would lead to irreparable harm to our economy. And I have heard from and talked to hundreds of Georgia taxpayers. Everyone is concerned about doing the right thing. Georgians are furious at the current situation and for good reason. I am angry and upset that the oversight supposed to be afforded by the regulatory bodies was not provided the way it should have been. The American taxpayers should never find themselves in this situation again, and that is why there must be confidence that what Congress passes will work – not for Wall Street but for Main Street. Before I give my support and work to pass legislation, it will have to have strong safeguards, accountable oversight, provisions that those who abused the system and the public trust will be punished, salary controls for the managers of the companies the taxpayers assist, and a commitment that any revenue earned by the treasury on this effort will be used 100% to retire the debt and not one penny used to expand government. I will fight any legislation that proposes to use one cent of these funds for pork barrel projects. Furthermore, I want to make sure that if fraud or other illegal acts took place that the people responsible are tried and punished. And while much of the focus has been on assisting larger banks and lenders, I am working to make sure that neighborhood banks and lenders are protected too. I intend to see that every single American has access to his or her money right now and forever and that Americans who need credit have it available to them. As the Senate debate unfolds, any proposed legislation must protect the citizens and taxpayers of Main Street, their savings, their retirement funds, their small businesses, their careers, their homes, and economic well being. This financial debacle on Wall Street must not be allowed to infect Main Street anymore than it already has. We have to clean up this mess and keep America on track. We must be certain that those responsible do not profit from this legislation and, where appropriate, necessary compensation policy be instituted. There will be no Golden Parachutes for executives in any plan I support. And civil and criminal penalties should be levied and pursued when and where appropriate. During these next critical hours and days, I will carefully review the details of whatever package emerges, and I will fight for Georgians in this process. I will have my say. I am prepared to work through the weekend and into October and beyond – I will not vote for just any proposal – I will work for and vote for the proposal that I truly believe is in the best interest of Georgians and Americans, and I pledge to work on this as long as it takes to get the job done right. |
For | Article |
Well Senator Chambliss,
You choose to ignore the majority of your constituents with your attitude that the Georgia voters are not capable of understanding what is going on. We do understand and we told you that we didn't want it - and you still voted for it. Its this "I know better than you" attitude that is going to get you fired next month.
Hundreds of Georgians call and emailed you, begging you to vote NO on the bail out and you ignored us. HOW DARE YOU! we put you in office and you are in Washington to represent us.
So start packing up your office, because you are coming home. Perhaps you can get a job with one of the companies you backed instead of the American people. I am ashamed of you and I think you owe the people of Georgia a huge apology.
X.25 was independent of the TCP/IP protocols that arose from the experimental work of DARPA on web design the ARPANET, Packet Radio Net and Packet Satellite Net during the same time period. Vinton Cerf and Robert Kahn developed the first description of the TCP protocols during 1973 and published a paper on the subject in May 1974. Use of the term "Internet" to describe a single global TCP/IP network originated in December 1974 with the publication of RFC 675, the first full specification of TCP that was written by Vinton Cerf, Yogen Dalal and Carl Sunshine, then at Stanford University. During the next nine years, work proceeded to refine the protocols search engine marketing and to implement them on a wide range of operating systems. The first TCP/IP-based wide-area network was operational by January 1, 1983 when all hosts on the ARPANET were switched over from the older NCP protocols. In 1985, the United States' National Science Foundation (NSF) commissioned home based business the construction of the NSFNET, a university 56 kilobit/second network backbone using computers called "fuzzballs" by their inventor, David L. Mills. The following year, NSF sponsored the conversion to a higher-speed 1.5 megabit/second network. A key decision to use the DARPA TCP/IP protocols was made by Dennis Jennings, then in charge of the Supercomputer program cheap web hosting at NSF.